On Sat, Dec 08, 2012 at 03:26:06AM +0100, Julien Claassen wrote: > Hello everyone! > I had noticed that before, but attributed it to some fault of > mine. When I quantise a track, notes get also changed to be VERY > staccato. Consider this sequence: > setq 8 > tquant 100 > If I understood correctly from the manual, the tquant 100 should > just move the notes to exact positions, but not shorten notes > unduly. Hey! With the current algorithm, any event is quantized, including note-offs and controllers. Basically, the algorithm contracts time around aligned note positions (1/8 notes) and dilates time around wrong postions. This way events are pushed around aligned positions while order is preserved. Preserving order is important since reordering events may introduce all kind of anomalies; example, this may create nested notes or certain notes may escape the sustain pedal, etc.. > Doing that, I also notice, that occasional notes are > unproportionally long, in contrast to the staccato notes. They still > fit their space, but the staccato notes are almost imperceivable. > Any ideas about that? If a note-on event is sligtly early and the note-off is slightly late, then the resulting note duration is smaller than the original, which makes it sound more staccato. Similarly if the note-on is late and the note-off is early, then the note duration is increased and it sounds more legato. The larger the quatization depth is, the more the effect is audible. 100% is extreme, and will aggregate events at aligned positions; the resulting notes durations become multiples of 1/8, including zero duration. Probably imperceivable notes you observe are zero-length notes. > Any hints, how to improve the results? Try using either a quantization step smaller than the typical note duration or a smaller quantization depth (100% is really extreme!). I use typically around 50% for piano, 75% for bass, 80-90% for percussions and almost never 100%, maybe except for electronic beats. When notes are very short, I use half of the quatization step; this requires playing more precisely the sequence; if so, either I lean it better or I record it at around ~85% of the original tempo (example "fac 85"). -- AlexandreReceived on Sat, 8 Dec 2012 11:45:27 +0100
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Nov 08 2017 - 16:32:23 CET